Carcass Composition and Resistance to Fasting in Neonatal Piglets Born of Sows Immunized against Somatostatin and/or Receiving Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor Injections during Gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thirty-eight gestating sows were either immunized against somatostatin (SRIF) and/or injected with growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF). Treatment effects on carcass composition and resistance of newborn piglets to a 60-hour fast were investigated. Protein content of carcasses at birth was increased in piglets of sows receiving GRF or immunized against SRIF, however, when sows received both treatments there was a reduction in carcass protein content (p = 0.01). Other carcass components were unaltered by treatments, and none of the treatments affected metabolic or endocrine profiles of piglets at birth. Concentrations of GH, IGF-I (p less than 0.01), glucagon and cortisol (p less than 0.05) increased linearly with duration of fast, whereas glucose values decreased. Resistance to fasting was unaltered in piglets from any treatment thereby suggesting that exogenous GRF and/or SRIF immunization of sows during gestation are unlikely to improve survival of newborn piglets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".