MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003956639 · doi:10.1021/jp045811u

Synthesis and Characterization of Alkoxide-Derived Pt Nanoparticles

2005· article· en· W2003956639 on OpenAlexaff
H. A. Andreas, V. I. Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlkoxideCharacterization (materials science)NanoparticleMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identification of the species formed during the in situ reduction of hexachloroplatinic acid by sodium ethoxide, forming a Pt sol, is made. The solution phase is shown to consist of suspended metallic Pt nanoparticles (1-3 nm in diameter), acetaldehyde, and a Pt(II) species, identified by NMR and X-ray adsorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) to be NaPtCl3(C2H4), a sodium analogue of Zeise's salt [KPtCl3(C2H4)]. The NaPtCl3(C2H4) product exhibits greater stability in both ethanol and air than the conventional Zeise's salt, providing a means of storing the useful Zeise's anion [PtCl3(C2H4)-]. Electrochemistry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses have shown that the precipitate phase formed during the synthesis is composed solely of Pt particles approximately 6 nm in diameter and NaCl. Thermal gravimetric analysis/differential scanning calorimetry (TGA/DSC) showed that the color of the precipitate is an accurate gauge of the ratio of Pt to NaCl, with the lightest to darkest precipitates containing from 1% to 40% nanoparticulate Pt by mass, respectively. A comprehensive characterization of both phases formed has allowed us to propose a mechanism for the conversion of hexachloroplatinic acid to Pt nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207