Oxorhenium(V) Complexes with the Non-Sulfur-Containing Amino Acid Histidine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Equivalent amounts of ReOX(3)(OPPh(3))(Me(2)S) (where X = Cl, Br) and L-histidine (L-hisH) in acetonitrile yield ReOX(2)(L-his), in which the amino acid monoanion is N,N,O-tridentate. X-ray diffraction work on both compounds shows that the three donors occupy a face in a distorted octahedron and the carboxylate oxygen is coordinated trans to the Re=O bond. The 2:1 complex [ReO(L-his)(2)]I is obtained by reacting 2 equiv of L-histidine with ReO(2)I(PPh(3))(2) in methanol in the presence of NaOCH(3). (1)H NMR spectroscopy indicates that these complexes contain one N,N,O-tridentate histidine anion coordinated as above and one N,N-bidentate histidine anion, whose carboxylate group is free. By refluxing ReOX(2)(L-his) in methanol, the carboxylic groups esterify and two octahedral units condense into an oxo-bridged dinuclear complex [ReOX(2)(L-hisMe)](2)O containing N,N-bidentate histidine methyl ester. The O=Re-O-Re=O backbone is approximately linear, and the two ReOX(2)(L-hisMe) units are related by a 2-fold axis through the central oxygen. Crystals of [ReOBr(2)(L-hisMe)](2)O consist of an ordered phase containing two of the possible diastereoisomers in a 1:1 ratio. (1)H NMR spectra of these crystals include two sets of signals, consistent with the presence of two isomers with C(2) symmetry, and the spectra of the nonrecrystallized material confirm that these are the only two isomers formed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".