Two-electron bound state formation in the<i>t–J–U</i>model for exchange-coupled planes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An anisotropic t-J-U model Hamiltonian is used to model electron behaviour in quasi-2d materials in the dilute limit, and as a highly simplified representation of the weakly coupled CuO2 planes of the high-Tc cuprates we model the very poor out-of-plane conductivity via the complete suppression of interplanar hopping. However, we do include the very weak interplanar superexchange, and are thus considering a model of exchange-coupled planes. For an isotropic three-dimensional system in the dilute limit, we find that the formation of two-particle bound states requires Jc/t ~ 5.9. Also, it is known that Jc/t = 2 for a 2d square lattice. However, for our model of exchange-coupled planes any infinitesimal interplanar exchange (Jc = 0) is adequate to form bound states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".