MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W200401254

3-D image guidance for minimally invasive robotic coronary artery bypass.

2000· article· en· W200401254 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomMedicineEndoscopeVisualizationSurgical planningThorax (insect anatomy)Port (circuit theory)ArteryArtificial intelligenceCardiothoracic surgeryComputer visionRadiologyComputer scienceSurgeryAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The introduction of a robot-assisted microsurgical system has made endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (ECABG) possible. Despite the success of this approach, surgeons still require better visualization tools for pre-surgical planning and intra-operative image guidance. Such visualization tools could, for example, assist in the placement of thoracic ports to acquire optimum access to the target vessels. In this paper we discuss the essential steps toward image-guided completely endoscopic coronary bypass surgery with robot assistance, and we present our preliminary efforts toward the development of a three-dimensional (3-D) virtual cardiac surgical planning platform (VCSP) for ECABG. METHODS: Preoperative 3-D images of the thorax acquired with computed tomography and electrocardiogram-gated magnetic resonance imaging are imported into VCSP. Using VCSP, a user may interactively visualize and manipulate the simulated thoracic ports in 3-D within the reconstructed thoracic region. We have also implemented a virtual endoscope to simulate the endoscopic view observed by the surgeon during the operation. Once the port placements for optimal access to the target vessels are determined, the positions of the simulated tools can be recorded and marked on the patient to specify the positions for port incisions. RESULTS: A static thorax phantom was used to verify the port placements obtained from VCSP simulations. The angles and the distances between the ports, the endoscope and the markers that were placed on the surface of the phantom were measured, and the results were compared with those obtained from simulation. The physical measured distances and angles agreed with the simulated results with average errors of 4 mm and 2 degrees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The VCSP image-guided surgical system allows a surgeon to visualize a patient's thorax in a 3-D interactive environment for planning surgical procedures, and to determine the optimum port placement based on preoperative 3-D images. However, during an operation, the positions and orientation of the heart and the coronary arteries are changed from their corresponding locations in the preoperative images due to carbon-dioxide insufflation, lung deflation, and dynamic motions of the beating heart. One of our future goals of this project is the use of mathematical models that correct for these changes so that our system could be applied to intra-operative image guidance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it