MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004022934 · doi:10.2208/jscejg.66.103

STUDY OF HOMOSINIZATION TIME OF MIXING IN HIGH SLUDGE CONCENTRATED ANAEROBIC DIGESTER

2010· article· en· W2004022934 on OpenAlexaff
Mitsuharu Terashima, Kazuya Komatsu, Hidenari Yasui, Rajeev Goel, Chihiro Inoue, Koichi Suto, Y. Y. LI, Tatsuya Noike

Bibliographic record

VenueDoboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu G · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsHydromantis Environmental Software Solutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixing (physics)Anaerobic digestionAnaerobic exerciseWaste managementEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryChemistryMethaneEngineeringPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

高濃度嫌気性消化槽において攪拌機の混合性能を定量的に評価できるようにするため,嫌気性消化汚泥のレオロジー特性を記述するための擬塑性流体モデルを組み込んだCFDモデルと槽内の均一化の度合いを定量化するためのパラメーター(UI)を用いて,ドラフトチューブ式機械攪拌の実規模嫌気性消化槽の混合を検討した.トレーサーの均一化の進捗はUIによって定量化され,槽内に形成される渦の大きさによって左右される低速度域の大きさが均一化時間に影響した.本検討の範囲においては汚泥濃度(X)と均一化時間-汚泥循環時間比(TH/TR)の間には直線関係が認められた.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDoboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu GSame topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207