Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (IFTS), named FTS-2, is being developed by the University of Lethbridge for use with the SCUBA-2 sub-millimeter bolometric camera on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT). The FTS-2 optical model was developed and optimized in Zemax by the Institut National d'Optique (INO) to maximize the FOV and efficiency over a range of spectral resolutions. The IFTS has been designed as a folded system including corner cubes in the interferometer moving mirror, and extended polynomial surfaces in the interferometer folding mirrors. The instrument design for FTS-2 is described elsewhere; here we present an analysis of the modeled performance of the IFTS in terms of achievable Field Of View (FOV), spot pattern and vignetting, at Zero Path Difference (ZPD) and for the 2 resolution modes. The predicted imaging performance is compared to that of the SCUBA-2 camera alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".