A New Statistical–Dynamical Downscaling Procedure Based on EOF Analysis for Regional Time Series Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new statistical–dynamical downscaling procedure is developed and then applied to high-resolution (regional) time series generation and wind resource assessment. The statistical module of the new procedure uses empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis for the generation of large-scale atmospheric component patterns. The dominant atmospheric patterns (associated with the EOF modes explaining most of the statistical variance) are then dynamically downscaled or adjusted to high-resolution terrain and surface roughness by using the Global Environmental Multiscale–Limited Area Model (GEM-LAM). Regional time series are constructed using the model outputs. The new method is applied to the Gaspé region of Québec in Canada. The dataset used is the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis of wind, temperature, humidity, and geopotential height during the period 1958–2004. Regional time series of wind speed and temperature are constructed, and a numerical wind atlas of the Gaspé region is generated. The generated time series and the numerical wind atlas are compared with observations at different masts located in the Gaspé Peninsula and are also compared with a numerical wind atlas for the same region generated in Yu et al. The results suggest that the newly developed procedure can be useful to generate regional time series and reasonably accurate numerical wind atlases using large-scale data with much less computational effort than previous techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".