MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2004036048 · doi:10.1353/can.2012.0018

Brokering Belonging: Chinese in Canada's Age of Exclusion, 1885-1945 (review)

2012· article· en· W2004036048 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Timothy J. Stanley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationChinaMainstreamChinese americansEthnic groupHistoryWorld War IIGender studiesSpanish Civil WarPolitical scienceGenealogySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Brokering Belonging: Chinese in Canada's Age of Exclusion, 1885-1945 Timothy J. Stanley Brokering Belonging: Chinese in Canada's Age of Exclusion, 1885-1945. Lisa Rose Mar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. Pp. 230, xvi, $27.95 paper Brokered Belonging calls for 'an integrated history of Canada, the United States and the Pacific World during the Exclusion Era' (132). Nominally a study of the role of ethnic 'brokers,' that is of those who daily negotiated relations between the Chinese and the dominant society, it challenges accounts that have either seen the Chinese in Canada as a community apart from the mainstream or as solely of interest because of its exclusion. For Lisa Mar, the Chinese were complex actors fully integrated into Canadian and transnational history. She demonstrates this through five superb case studies of immigration interpreters, legal advisors, the 1922-3 Victoria students strike, the 1924 Survey of Race Relations, and the workers movement during the Second World War. Each study is informed by a thorough canvassing of both Chinese- and English-language sources, including from relatively newly available Chinese archives, such as those of the Chung Collection at the University of British Columbia and the most careful rereading in thirty years of the major source on Chinese Canadian history, Dahan Gongbao or The Chinese Times. Mar's study is also firmly located in the literatures on Asian Americans and local elites in China. The role of traditional brokers is brilliantly demonstrated in her groundbreaking account of immigration under the head tax regulations of the early twentieth century. She details how the entire immigration system depended on Chinese interpreters and how rival factions in both communities struggled for control of these positions. In 1909-11, the Vancouver interpreter Yip On actively sabotaged the regulations he was charged with enforcing. Yip was the chief organizer of the Chinese Empire Reform Association, a political activist who had [End Page 316] organized the first successful boycott of foreign goods in China in 1908-9 in protest against foreign discrimination such as the head tax. Yet he got and maintained his interpreter's position through connections to the Liberal Party patronage machine in bc. The whole immigration system was corrupt with a network of kickbacks that reached the highest levels of the Liberal Party. Corruption was such that by the 1930s as much as a quarter of the Chinese population in Canada consisted of undocumented workers. Mar shows that factions of the Chinese political and commercial elite were inexorably tied to factions of the dominant society's elite. Thus, where others have seen two sets of politics at work, Mar forcefully argues there was a single set inexorably tied together. By the 1920s, traditional brokerage was breaking down and, along with it, a long-standing politics of placating and accommodating white officialdom. This is the backdrop against which Mar reinterprets the 1922-3 students strike in Victoria, seeing it as directly connected to the mass movements of the May Fourth Movement in China. But traditional brokerage relations fully end only with the Second World War when British Columbia Chinese workers staged a series of illegal work stoppages, even establishing their own industrial union, as they struggled for equal pay, against discriminatory income tax regulations that starved families in China, and boycotted conscription in protest against disenfranchisement. Thus, for Mar it was on the shop floor and not the battlefield that the alliance was formed that won Chinese full voting and immigration rights. Indeed, Mar establishes that only 10 per cent of those eligible served in the Canadian armed forces. But many readers will be most intrigued by Mar's chapter on the 1924 Survey of Race Relations, conducted under the leadership of Charles Park, the founder of the Chicago school of sociology. Mar argues that the findings of the survey, intended to document the situation of Asians on the Pacific Coast of North America, were controlled by Vancouver Chinese community leaders who ensured that the survey's researchers heard only a single narrative, that of acculturated Chinese blocked from full integration by racist exclusions. In so doing, they shaped one of the founding narratives of modern sociology and one that...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→