Profiles of Fatty Acid Distribution of Different Acyl Lipids from Red and Black Rices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The present study is focused on the variation in fatty acid (FA) composition of the different acyl lipids in red and black rices. Total lipids were fractionated by TLC into eight subfractions. Significant differences (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) in FA distribution were found among the different acyl lipids when the two cultivars were compared. There were no significant differences (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) in the positional distribution of FA in triacylglycerols; unsaturated FA was predominantly concentrated in the <em>sn</em>-2 position while saturated FA primarily occupied the <em>sn</em>-1 position or <em>sn</em>-3 position in the oils. Significant differences (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) in FA distribution existed when the individual phospholipids were compared. Based on the FA composition of the different acyl lipids, it seems that red and black rices are very similar to each other with a few exceptions. The results suggest that these rice lipids may be well incorporated into our daily diet to improve value of the Japanese diet.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".