Effects of Hydrodynamics on Cultures of Mammalian Neural Stem Cell Aggregates in Suspension Bioreactors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammalian neural stem cells hold great promise for the treatment of central nervous system disorders. However, to be a viable clinical treatment for the millions of individuals afflicted with these disorders, it is necessary to develop cell expansion protocols. Although difficult to grow in bioreactors, neural stem cells can be expanded in carefully designed media as aggregates of brain tissue. The objective of this study was to examine the control of the aggregate size in a batch culture by manipulating the agitation rate, and hence the liquid shear and oxygen transfer rate, in bioreactors. This is very important because large aggregates can develop necrotic centers of dead cells due to transport limitations of key nutrients. Manipulation of the agitation rate allowed us to control the average aggregate diameter to 150 μm, below levels where necrosis would occur. Moreover, for the best conditions, viable stem cell densities of 1.2 × 10 6 cells/mL were achieved in a batch culture with viabilities remaining above 80% for the majority of the runs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".