Optical properties of porous helical thin films and the effects of post-deposition annealing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porous thin films have been fabricated by physical vapor deposition at an extremely oblique angle of incidence (85°). This deposition technique, called glancing angle deposition (GLAD), was used to create thin films composed of isolated helical columns. By investigating a variety of dielectrics, we found that helical GLAD films fabricated from titanium dioxide produce the strongest chiral optical response because of its large refractive index. Further improvements were made by using post-deposition annealing to form anatase and rutile polycrystalline phases of TiO<sub>2</sub>. By tailoring the pitch of the helical structures, the circular Bragg reflection band was tuned to preferentially reflect red, green, and blue light. The high porosity of a GLAD film (>50%) permits liquid crystals (LC) to be incorporated into the pores of the helical nanostructure, which creates chiral alignment in otherwise non-chiral LCs. This technique improves circular Bragg reflection and can create addressable hybrid materials with potential applications to high-efficiency reflective displays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".