MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004065249 · doi:10.4021/jmc.v4i10.1428

Unilateral Agenesis of Pulmonary Artery

2013· article· en· W2004065249 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gülfidan Çakmak, Nurdan Göçgün, Emre Evren, Zuhal Aydan Sağlam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticTetralogy of FallotPulmonary arteryCardiologyChest painRight pulmonary arteryAgenesisRadiologyInternal medicineLeft pulmonary arterySurgeryHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isolated unilateral agenesis of pulmonary artery was first defined at 1868. Although the exact prevalance is unknown, in a study it is estimated as 1/200,000. Congenital unilateral agenesis of pulmonary artery is a rare anomaly which is frequently associated with other congenital cardiovascular anomalies such as tetralogy of Fallot or septal defects. In 37% of cases left pulmonary artery is absent while in 63% the right one is absent. Nearly 30% of patients are asymptomatic. When symptomatic, patients may experience chest pain, pleural effusion, recurrent pulmonary infections, dyspnea or limited exertion or hemoptysis. Several methods are used in diagnosis such as computerized tomography, bronchography, perfusion scintigraphy, echocardiography and cardiac catheterisation. Massive hemoptysis, cardiac insufficiency, bronchectasis and necrotizing bronchopnemonia may be included among the complications. The following case report presents a patient who was not diagnosed until adult ages. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jmc1428w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207