MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004103929 · doi:10.1109/inista.2014.6873591

Adaptive hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization-Gravitational Search Algorithm for fuzzy controller tuning

2014· article· en· W2004103929 on OpenAlexaff
Radu‐Emil Precup, Radu‐Codruţ David, Alexandra-Iulia Szedlak-Stinean, Mircea‐Bogdan Rădac, Emil M. Petriu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationControl theory (sociology)Sensitivity (control systems)Controller (irrigation)Fuzzy logicFuzzy control systemParametric statisticsPID controllerAdaptive controlMulti-swarm optimizationNonlinear systemComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsAlgorithmControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Temperature controlArtificial intelligencePhysicsElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an innovative adaptive hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) dedicated to the optimal tuning of Takagi-Sugeno-Kang PI-fuzzy controllers (T-S-K PI-FCs). The adaptive hybrid PSO-GSA is comprised from five stages, which support the solving of optimization problems with objective functions that depend on the control error and on the output sensitivity function, and the variables of the objective functions are the fuzzy controller tuning parameters. The adaptive hybrid PSO-GSA is included in the controller tuning to offer control systems with T-S-K PI-FCs that ensure a reduced process parametric sensitivity. Digital simulation and experimental results are given to validate the fuzzy controller tuning in a laboratory nonlinear servo system application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207