The Properties and Light Stability of Silk Adhered to Sheer Silk and Polyester Support Fabrics with Poly(Vinyl Acetate) Copolymer Adhesives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adhesil1e support treatments for the conservation of silk artifacts were evaluated by comparing the properlies and relative light stability of silk laminates and their components. Samples were prepared by adhering silk habutae, representing the artifact, to a silk or polyester crepeline support fabric with either Appretan MB extra or Lascaux Hot-seal Adhesive 371. both poly(vinyl acetate) copolymer adhesives. Laminates and unlaminated components were exposed to xenon arc radiation and subsequently characterized by measuring colour change. stiffness. and tensile properties. The laminates were stronger. stiffer and sometimes of a different colour than plain silk hahutae. The laminates yellowed and exhibited losses in tensile properties when exposed to light, in a manner similar to that of plain silk habutae. The loss of tensile properties and yellowing of the support materials upon exposure to light were at least retarded when covered by the habutae in the laminates. Much less flexible than their components to begin with. the laminates also stiffened more rapidly than their components when exposed to light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it