MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cloning and characterization of the groE locus from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae

2006· article· en· W2004127343 on OpenAlexaff
Guy Vézina, Marc Sirois, Natalie Clairoux, Maurice Boissinot

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroESGroELBiologyGeneticsActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeNucleic acid sequenceComplementationGeneMolecular biologyEscherichia coliSequence analysisMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 4.4-kb DNA fragment was cloned from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (strain 4074, serotype 1) by genetic complementation with Escherichia coli groES-groEL mutant strains. Sequence analysis of this fragment revealed a purine nucleoside phosphorylase (DeoD)-encoding gene homolog (deoD), heat-shock response-encoding genes for the small (groES) and large subunits (groEL) and a partial open reading frame encoding an alcohol dehydrogenase homolog (adhE). The predicted amino-acid sequence of groES and groEL genes showed extensive sequence identity (80-95%) with other Pasteurellaceae. The gene organization surrounding the groE locus was different from that of Haemophilus infuenzae. When expressed in E. coli, groES-groEL genes were capable of complementing the growth of a lambda lytic phage, indicating a structural as well as functional conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207