MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sm-Nd dating of the giant Sullivan Pb-Zn-Ag deposit, British Columbia

2000· article· en· W2004128611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shao‐Yong Jiang, John F. Slack, Martin R. Palmer

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceGeological surveyChinaHistoryArchaeologyGeologyComputer sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| August 01, 2000 Sm-Nd dating of the giant Sullivan Pb-Zn-Ag deposit, British Columbia Shao-Yong Jiang; Shao-Yong Jiang 1State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John F. Slack; John F. Slack 2U.S. Geological Survey, National Center, MS 954, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Martin R. Palmer Martin R. Palmer 3T.H. Huxley School, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Shao-Yong Jiang 1State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China John F. Slack 2U.S. Geological Survey, National Center, MS 954, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA Martin R. Palmer 3T.H. Huxley School, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, UK Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 11 Jan 2000 Revision Received: 19 May 2000 Accepted: 23 May 2000 First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 Geological Society of America Geology (2000) 28 (8): 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<751:SDOTGS>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 11 Jan 2000 Revision Received: 19 May 2000 Accepted: 23 May 2000 First Online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Shao-Yong Jiang, John F. Slack, Martin R. Palmer; Sm-Nd dating of the giant Sullivan Pb-Zn-Ag deposit, British Columbia. Geology 2000;; 28 (8): 751–754. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<751:SDOTGS>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract We report here Sm and Nd isotope data for hydrothermal tourmalinites and sulfide ores from the giant Sullivan Pb-Zn-Ag deposit, which occurs in the lower part of the Mesoproterozoic Purcell (Belt) Supergroup. Whole-rock samples of quartz-tourmaline tourmalinite from the footwall alteration pipe yield a Sm-Nd isochron age of 1470 ± 59 Ma, recording synsedimentary B metasomatism of clastic sediments during early evolution of the Sullivan hydrothermal system. Data for variably altered (chloritized and/or albitized) tourmalinites from the hanging wall of the deposit, which are believed to have formed originally ca. 1470 Ma, define a younger 1076 ± 77 Ma isochron because of resetting of Sm and Nd isotopes during Grenvillian metamorphism. HCl leachates of bedded Pb-Zn ore yield a Sm-Nd isochron age of 1451 ± 46 Ma, which is consistent with syngenetic-exhalative mineralization ca. 1470 Ma; this age could also reflect a slightly younger, epigenetic hydrothermal event. Results obtained for the Sullivan deposit indicate that the Sm-Nd geochronometer has the potential to directly date mineralization and alteration in stratabound sulfide deposits that are not amenable to dating by other isotope methods. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1330.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207