Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'atelier interculturel de l'imaginaire (AII) est un lieu de circulation de la parole et des imaginaires. Il a merg progressivement partir des situations concrtes de recherche et intervention auprs des personnes immigrantes et rfugies, de formation des professionnels de l'intervention, de formation des tudiants universitaires, notamment des tudiants des trois cycles en ethnologie de l'interculturel, de la formation des matres au secondaire et, plus rcemment il a t expriment pour la dynamique en groupes interculturels parmi les tudiants internationaux. Dans cet article, aprs avoir prsent l'mergence et le fonctionnement de l'atelier interculturel de l'imaginaire, j'en illustrerai le droulement dans deux contextes distincts, d'abord celui de l'accompagnement des personnes immigrantes et rfugies dans la ville de Qubec, ensuite celui de l'accompagnement des tudiants internationaux lors de stages sminaires interculturels en Chine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".