Transformation of the Capital Market Stability Model under the Influence of the Financial Globalization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the course of economic globalization a process of formation of the united financial market has evolved.Integratedness of different sectors of financial market into its global form is largely stipulated by development offinancial innovations and of new financial instruments. Subjacent and timeless nature of modern financialtransactions leads to blurring of distinction between money and capital markets. The united market means agradual merge of financial risks and increase of volumes and unpredictability of aggregate risk in the result ofsynergetic effect contained in the nature of financial market as of a nonlinear dynamical system. Seriousinfluence on stability of financial market has a behavioral psychology of its participants that is connected withreflexivity specific to financial capital. Financial market can be described only by nonlinear stochastic equations.In this article we made the efforts to set the parameters for such a model. Basing on non-stability of a globalfinancial market and under influence of globalization factors it was concluded that it is necessary to check thehypotheses on formation of a financial cycle apart from general business cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".