Distinct Conformation-mediated Functions of an Active Site Loop in the Catalytic Reactions of NAD-dependent D-Lactate Dehydrogenase and Formate Dehydrogenase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The three-dimensional structures of NAD-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase (D-LDH) and formate dehydrogenase (FDH), which resemble each other, imply that the two enzymes commonly employ certain main chain atoms, which are located on corresponding loop structures in the active sites of the two enzymes, for their respective catalytic functions. These active site loops adopt different conformations in the two enzymes, a difference likely attributable to hydrogen bonds with Asn97 and Glu141, which are also located at equivalent positions in D-LDH and FDH, respectively. X-ray crystallography at 2.4-A resolution revealed that replacement of Asn97 with Asp did not markedly change the overall protein structure but markedly perturbed the conformation of the active site loop in Lactobacillus pentosus D-LDH. The Asn97-->Asp mutant D-LDH exhibited virtually the same k(cat), but about 70-fold higher K(M) value for pyruvate than the wild-type enzyme. For Paracoccus sp. 12-A FDH, in contrast, replacement of Glu141 with Gln and Asn induced only 5.5- and 4.3-fold increases in the K(M) value, but 110 and 590-fold decreases in the k(cat) values for formate, respectively. Furthermore, these mutant FDHs, particularly the Glu141-->Asn enzyme, exhibited markedly enhanced catalytic activity for glyoxylate reduction, indicating that FDH is converted to a 2-hydroxy-acid dehydrogenase on the replacement of Glu141. These results indicate that the active site loops play different roles in the catalytic reactions of D-LDH and FDH, stabilization of substrate binding and promotion of hydrogen transfer, respectively, and that Asn97 and Glu141, which stabilize suitable loop conformations, are essential elements for proper loop functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".