MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004193231 · doi:10.1063/1.1565334

Power laws for rough wall turbulent boundary layers

2003· article· en· W2004193231 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathan Amon Kotey, Donald J. Bergstrom, Mark F. Tachie

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsTurbulenceBoundary layerLaw of the wallMechanicsPower lawSurface finishSurface roughnessReynolds numberShear velocityBoundary (topology)LawRoughness lengthBoundary layer thicknessPressure gradientClassical mechanicsMeteorologyMathematical analysisWind speedWind profile power lawThermodynamicsMathematicsMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An assessment of the ability of power laws to describe the mean velocity profile in the overlap region of a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer is reported. The experiments were performed in a wind tunnel on smooth and four different types of rough surfaces at moderate Reynolds numbers. A novel modification to the power law velocity profile is proposed to account for the effect of surface roughness in the overlap region. This modification is analogous to the use of a roughness function to produce a downward shift in the logarithmic velocity profile. The roughness parameters in the proposed equation more accurately follow the effect of roughness on skin friction than does the roughness shift ΔU+. The present study shows that power laws can be used to effectively describe the mean velocity profile over a wider range than a log law for both smooth and rough surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207