Theoretical study of hyperfine coupling constants and electron spin<i>g</i>factors for X<sup>2</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup>diatomics from Groups 1 and 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ESR parameters of the cations Be+ 2, Mg+ 2, Ca+ 2, BeMg+, BeCa+, MgCa+ and the mixed radicals ZBe, ZMg, ZCa (Z = Li, Na, K), all having a X 2Σ+ u(1σ2 g1σu)/X 2Σ+(1σ22σ) ground state, have been studied theoretically. The A iso and A dip constants have been calculated with UHF, CISD, MP2, B3LYP, PW91PW91 wavefunctions, and 6–311+G(2df) basis sets. The electron spin g factors (magnetic moment μs) have been evaluated from correlated (MRDCI) wavefunctions, using a Hamiltonian based on Breit-Pauli theory with perturbation expansions up to second order, and 6–311 + G(2d) basis sets. As expected for s-rich radicals, the hyperfine spectra are governed by the A iso terms. Both Δg∥ and Δg⊥ values are negative, but Δg∥ lies close to zero. For Δg⊥, the coupling with 1 2Π(u) dominates the sum-over-states expansions. Although the singly occupied MOs (SOMO) are mostly of s character, the |Δg⊥| are relatively large, up to 5200 ppm for cationic, and up to 7850 ppm for neutral radicals. These large values are caused by low excitation energies and high magnetic transition moments, the latter due to the fact that the σ∗(s-s) SOMO has the same nodal properties as a pσ orbital. Of the radicals considered here, an ESR spectrum is available only for Mg+ 2. Our theoretical A iso of −287 MHz reproduces well the matrix result (-291 MHz). Calculated values of −10 ppm for Δg∥ and of −1280 ppm for Δg⊥ give an average 〈Δg〉 = −860 ppm that lies within the experimental range of −600(±300) ppm in Ne, and of −1300(±500) ppm in Ar matrices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".