MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ethnic variation in CYP2A6*7, CYP2A6*8 and CYP2A6*10 as assessed with a novel haplotyping method

2005· article· en· W2004256112 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jill Mwenifumbo, Mark G. Myers, Tamara L. Wall, Shih‐Ku Lin, Edward M. Sellers, Rachel F. Tyndale

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenetics and Genomics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsCYP2A6HaplotypeAlleleGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyAllele frequencySNPGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytochrome P450 2A6 is the main human nicotine metabolizing enzyme coded for by a highly polymorphic gene, CYP2A6. CYP2A6*7, CYP2A6*8 and CYP2A6*10 are variant alleles common to Asian ethnicities. The CYP2A6*7 and CYP2A6*8 alleles each contain a non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 6558T>C and 6600G>T, respectively, whereas the CYP2A6*10 haplotype allele contains both. We have developed the first haplotyping assay; it can unambiguously distinguish the CYP2A6*7, CYP2A6*8 and CYP2A6*10 alleles. The allele frequencies of these three variants were assessed using the novel haplotyping assay in Chinese-Canadian (n=112), Chinese-American (n=221), Taiwanese (n=319), Korean-American (n=207) and Japanese-Canadian (n=64) populations, as well as in Caucasian (n=110) and African-Canadian (n=113) populations. Our new method demonstrated higher frequencies of CYP2A6*7 and CYP2A6*10, and a lower frequency of CYP2A6*8 in Asian populations, but no significant change of allele frequencies in Caucasian or African-Canadian populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacogenetics and GenomicsSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207