Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction thrusts of submerged water jets for different cylindrical nozzles are investigated numerically and experimentally. Simplified models of the pressure distribution on the interior walls of high-pressure chambers, the reaction thrust of water jets and the thrust coefficients are all established on the basis of the general characteristics of the isobaric surface near the inlet of the nozzle, respectively. Simulation studies on the reaction thrust are also conducted through a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software package called FLUENT. In particular, the effects of the inlet conditions as well as the nozzle dimensions on the reaction thrust of the water jet are addressed. Comparison analyses are also performed on the results of the simplified models, the CFD simulation and the experiments. It is concluded from the results that: (a) the model results and the CFD simulation results are in excellent agreement with the experimental results; (b) the nozzle diameter and the inlet conditions exert a significant influence on the reaction thrust of the water jet; and (c) the reaction thrust coefficient is almost a constant, ranging from 1.1 to 1.3. The related conclusions are extended to the study of the water hydraulic flapper-nozzle a servo valve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it