Loess Tourism Resource Exploitation Strategy in the Chinese Loess Plateau: A Case Study of White Deer Plateau
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As one of the important geologic tourism resources in the world, the Chinese loess landscape tourism has not beendeveloped deeply enough, which can not fulfill tourists’ tourism demands on different levels. Based on many successfuldevelopment experiences about sand tourism and ice snow tourism, according to the feature of loess environment,geographic conditions and traffic advantage, combining the advantages, features and development actuality of the loesslandscape on the Chinese Loess Plateau, the idea of constructing the loess sculpture garden on the White Deer Plateau isproposed in the article. The main problems existing in the tourism development of the White Deer Plateau are analyzed,and the necessity and feasibility to construct the loess sculpture garden are demonstrated, and the main contents toestablish the loess sculpture garden in the White Deer Plateau are proposed. The loess sculpture garden can completelyshow the special natural landscapes and the humanistic landscapes in the Loess Plateau, enhance the landscape value ofthe loess landscapes, deeply dig the scientific and educational values, closely combining the landscape feature with thepopular science oriented feature, drive the development of the tourism of the White Deer Plateau and make it to becomethe hot landscape and the popular science base of the tourism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it