MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004316630 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2008.0362

Beamforming technique to solve the hidden beam problem in wireless communication systems

2009· article· en· W2004316630 on OpenAlexaff
Deepali Arora, P. Agathoklis

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNull (SQL)BeamformingBeam (structure)ThroughputAntenna (radio)WirelessComputer sciencePlanar arrayAcousticsTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsTelecommunicationsPhysicsOpticsData miningCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method to deal with the hidden beam problem in carrier sensing medium access (CSMA)-based systems is proposed. The method is based on the modification of the beamformer weights that reduce null depths of any given beam. The proposed technique is applied to uniformly spaced linear antenna arrays with broadsided and endfired beams to planar beams and to Dolph–Chebychev beams. The throughput of non-persistent CSMA systems using a uniformly spaced broadsided linear antenna array is evaluated and the performance of the proposed technique is compared with that of a original beam in terms of reducing the hidden beam problem. The proposed methodology is shown to be effective in solving the hidden beam problem in a CSMA-based system by reducing the null depths and is shown to yield higher throughput than the original beam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207