MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004364385 · doi:10.1021/bi047523u

Gal4-VP16 Directs ATP-Independent Chromatin Reorganization in a Yeast Chromatin Assembly System

2005· article· en· W2004364385 on OpenAlexaff
Karen M. Robinson, Michael C. Schultz

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatinNucleosomeChromatin remodelingCell biologyChromatin structure remodeling (RSC) complexBiologyChIA-PETHistone codeSWI/SNFAAA proteinsSMARCA4HistoneDNAGeneticsATPaseBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major insights into the regulation of chromatin organization have stemmed from biochemical studies using Gal4-VP16, a chimeric transcriptional activator in which the DNA binding domain of Gal4p is fused to the activation domain of viral protein VP16. Unexpectedly, given previous intensive efforts to understand how Gal4-VP16 functions in the context of chromatin, we have uncovered a new mode of chromatin reorganization that is dependent on Gal4-VP16. This reorganization is performed by an activity in a crude DEAE (CD) fraction from budding yeast which also supports ATP-dependent assembly of physiologically spaced nucleosome arrays. Biochemical analysis reveals that the activity tightly associates with chromatin and reorganizes nucleosome arrays by a mechanism which is insensitive to ATP depletion after nucleosome assembly. It generates a chromatin organization in which a nucleosome is stably positioned immediately adjacent to Gal4p binding sites in the template DNA. Individual deletion of genes previously implicated in chromatin assembly and remodeling, namely, the histone chaperones NAP1, ASF1, and CAC1 and the SNF2-like DEAD/H ATPases SNF2, ISW1, ISW2, CHD1, SWR1, YFR038w, and SPT20, does not significantly perturb reorganization. Therefore, Gal4-VP16-directed chromatin reorganization in yeast can occur by an ATP-independent mechanism that does not require SAGA, SWI/SNF, Isw1, or Isw2 chromatin remodeling complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207