MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004382707 · doi:10.4021/jcgo.v1i4-5.19

A Rare Case of Postmenopausal Bleeding: Choriocarcinoma

2012· article· en· W2004382707 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mehmet Sıddık Evsen, Sak Muhammet Erdal, Soydinc Hatice Ender, Senem Şentürk, Uğur Fırat, Mehmet Küçüköner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChoriocarcinomaMedicineVaginal bleedingCytotrophoblastPOSTMENOPAUSAL BLEEDINGSyncytiotrophoblastGynecologyVaginal dischargeParametriumObstetricsCervixPregnancyCancerFetusInternal medicinePlacenta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choriocarcinoma is an aggressive malignant tumor comprised of sheets of anaplastic cytotrophoblast/syncytiotrophoblast cells. The majority of choriocarcinoma cases are of intra-uterine, gestational origin and generally develops within the first year following pregnancy, consequently it is generally observed within reproductive age groups. A 58-year-old woman was presented to our clinic with vaginal bleeding in the preceding months. The serum B-HCG level was 12414 mIU/mL. A pelvic ultrasound showed a 41 × 37 mm heterogeneous mass on the right anterior fundal wall of the corpus uteri, to which blood flow was increased on colour Doppler examination. Here in study, we present a case of postmenopausal uterine choriocarcinoma. Practitioner must be awareness of choriocarcinoma as a cause of postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jcgo19w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicGestational Trophoblastic Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207