MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004387662 · doi:10.1145/2642668.2642684

On-demand key distribution for body area networks for emergency case

2014· article· en· W2004387662 on OpenAlexaff
Haifa Alyami, Jun Liang Feng, Allaa R. Hilal, Otman Basir

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Body area networkOverhead (engineering)Wireless sensor networkScalabilityComputer scienceKey managementOpenness to experienceComputer securityResource (disambiguation)Health careScheme (mathematics)Computer networkCryptographyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent growth in the Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) has given rise to development of new and innovative medical applications. WSNs have occupied the medical area with immense benefits in reducing healthcare costs, doctor-patient efficiency, and enhanced openness for patients and healthcare professionals. Such sensors can be placed in or over a patient's body, forming a Body Area Network (BAN), to monitor the patient's health and vitalities. In these health monitoring applications, sensitive personal information is being transmitted over a network, thus, security needs to be embedded into the system from the start to guarantee privacy of the personal medical information. However, information security incurs additional overhead to the already resource-constrained BANs. This paper aims to provide a resource-efficient, scalable, and lightweight key management algorithm for cases of medical emergency, where a patient requires immediate medical assistance. The proposed key management algorithm securely establishes a key between a patient and the medical staff with minimal overhead without any prior knowledge of one another. The results show that the proposed scheme scales well with increasing number of nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207