Sacrifice subi ou sauvetage organisé. Le sort des archives en France durant la Grande Guerre, d’après le fonds de la direction ministérielle des Archives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La guerre de 1914-1918 a marqué les services d’archives en France comme les autres institutions culturelles. À travers le fonds d’archives de la direction ministérielle des Archives et les études consacrées aux départements du nord-est de la France, le sort du patrimoine archivistique durant cette période est aujourd’hui mieux connu : destructions majeures et ciblées, sélection des fonds à protéger et à évacuer vers des zones-refuge loin du front, tournées territoriales d’inspection et de recensement documentaire, donnent à voir l’implication concrète des archivistes, la mise en place de véritables plans d’urgence, des réponses ciblées à une situation de crise exceptionnelle, souvent dans le souvenir des pertes déjà subies lors de la guerre franco-prussienne de 1870. Cette mémoire des conflits successifs s’illustre particulièrement dans les négociations de l’immédiat après-guerre, lorsqu’il s’agit de faire reconnaître, par les réparations, les revendications ou une politique de reconstitution documentaire, l’ampleur du choc patrimonial subi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".