MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004416609 · doi:10.1002/pssb.200304477

Quasi‐one dimensional organic conductors: interplay between a magnetic field and the dimensionality

2004· article· en· W2004416609 on OpenAlexaff
S. Haddad, S. Charfi‐Kaddour, C. Nickel, M. Héritier, R. Bennaceur

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurse of dimensionalityElectrical conductorMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsCrossoverCompetition (biology)Field (mathematics)Focus (optics)Statistical physicsState (computer science)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsQuantum mechanicsArtificial intelligenceEcologyAlgorithmPure mathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We briefly review some key properties of the quasi‐one dimensional organic conductors. We focus on some puzzling issues of the normal state in particular the problem of dimensional crossover. We show that several features of the normal state are consistent with the Luttinger liquid description. We stress on the competition between the magnetic field and the dimensionality. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (b)Same topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207