MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Does a history of peritoneal dialysis result in an impaired gastrointestinal life quality?

2007· article· en· W2004435340 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gunnar H. Heine, Chantal Y. KASTNER, Thomas Jahnke, Martin K. Kuhlmann

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeritoneal dialysisHemodialysisIntensive care medicineDialysisQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) invariably induces sclerotic changes in the peritoneal membrane. The impact of these changes on the well-being of PD patients has not been studied sufficiently. In a matched-pair analysis, the gastrointestinal life quality of patients with a history of PD was compared with end-stage renal disease patients who never performed PD, using a standardized questionnaire (gastrointestinal life-quality index [GLQI]). We identified all patients in our dialysis unit who underwent PD between 1989 and 2001 and who were alive in October 2001 (PD patients; n=53). Patients who were treated by hemodialysis (HD patients) were recruited as pairs. Hemodialysis and PD patients did not differ in gastrointestinal life quality (GLQI: HD 106.0+/-16.4 points; PD 104.0+/-16.7 points; p=0.70). Gastrointestinal life quality was neither correlated with the number of peritonitis episodes, nor with the duration of PD treatment. Peritoneal dialysis treatment is not associated with a long-term impairment of gastrointestinal life quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→