How Does Fluoride Concentration in the Tooth Affect Apatite Crystal Size?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite fluoride's (F) well-documented ability to prevent caries, the effects of F concentrations on enamel and dentin apatite crystals are unknown. The present study examined the hypothesis that tooth F concentration and tooth crystallite size correlate. One hundred human unerupted third molars were studied-53 from Fortaleza-Brazil (F water 0.7 ppm), 23 from Toronto (1.0 ppm), and 24 from Montreal (0.2 ppm). F concentration was analyzed by Neutron Activation Analysis and apatite crystal size by powder x-ray diffraction. A positive correlation between dentin F concentration and enamel crystallite length and width was found. Enamel crystallite length was significantly greater in teeth from Fortaleza than in teeth from Toronto (p = 0.011) and Montreal (p = 0.003). Enamel crystallite widths were significantly greater in Fortaleza teeth compared with those from Toronto (p = 0.020) and Montreal (p < 0.001). No difference in the dentin crystallite size was seen in the 3 regions. Thus, tooth F concentration and crystallite size correlate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it