MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Calorimetric Evidence for an Exercise Intensity Dependent Increase in the Level of Postexercise Hyperthermia

2010· article· en· W2004452673 on OpenAlexaffabout
Glen P. Kenny, Ollie Jay

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperthermiaExercise intensityIntensity (physics)Internal medicineChemistryThermoregulationCore temperatureMedicineAnimal scienceEndocrinologyHeart rateBiologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies show that, in parallel to the rapid decrease in metabolic heat production following cessation of exercise, there is a rapid decline in local skin blood flow and sweating to pre-exercise levels during the early stages of recovery. Consequently, a prolonged sustained elevation of core and muscle temperature relative to pre-exercise rest, which is dependent upon the intensity of exercise, is evidenced. It is unclear, however, if this pattern of response is due to a greater thermal inertia (i.e., the time taken to balance the differential rates of heat production and heat loss) during exercise as opposed to during recovery. PURPOSE: We investigated heat balance during and following exercise of different intensities using a whole-body calorimeter regulated to an ambient air temperature of 30°C. METHODS: Six physically active males performed 60-min of cycling at a constant rate of metabolic heat production of either: 1) 200 (L); 2) 350 (M) or; 3) 500 (H) Watts followed by 60-min of seated rest. RESULTS: Exercise resulted in a change in body heat content of +227±37, +308±40 and +396±31 kJ for the L, M and H exercise conditions respectively. Values were significantly different between L and H only (p<0.05). This was paralleled by a corresponding increase in rectal temperature of 0.18±07, 0.56±11 and 0.84±06°C for L, M and H respectively. Postexercise, there were no differences in the rates of metabolic heat production and whole-body heat loss between the three conditions. Consequently, the magnitude of change of body heat content was similar between conditions (i.e., -46±6, -56±8, and -70±8 kJ for L, M and H respectively). Only ∼21, 19 and 18% of the change in body heat content during exercise was dissipated postexercise for L, M and H respectively. This was paralleled by a sustained elevation in rectal temperature above baseline resting equal to 0.15±0.04, 0.30±0.06 and 0.41±0.09°C for the L, M and H conditions respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intensity dependent increase in the postexercise elevation in core temperature is likely associated with a greater thermal inertia during recovery and not exercise. Funding support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicSports Performance and Training→French-language works237,207→