MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004505634 · doi:10.1002/cjce.21780

Role of the hydrophobicity of mineral fines in the formation of oil–mineral aggregates

2013· article· en· W2004505634 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Weizhi Wang, Ying Zheng, Kenneth Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersantMineral oilMineralCrude oilChemistryPetroleum engineeringChemical engineeringEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryGeologyOrganic chemistryDispersion (optics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oil–mineral aggregates (OMA) have been an effective approach in reclaiming accidental oil spills. In this study, kaolin is modified to present various levels of hydrophobicity. The results have shown that more crude oil, especially viscous crude, can be trapped in OMA when modified kaolin is used and no dispersant is added. The role of modified kaolin in OMA formation is eliminated when dispersant is used. It is also noted that there exists an optimal hydrophobicity in promoting the OMA formation and oil removal performance. Excessive hydrophobicity can lead to mineral self‐aggregation, which results in less interaction between oil and the mineral. © 2013 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207