MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004512227 · doi:10.1109/tap.2009.2037766

On the Design of a Compact Neural Network-Based DOA Estimation System

2009· article· en· W2004512227 on OpenAlexaff
Nelson J. G. Fonseca, Michael Coudyser, Jean‐Jacques Laurin, Jean‐Jules Brault

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirection of arrivalBeamformingComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Artificial neural networkSmart antennaSIGNAL (programming language)Antenna arraySignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Degree (music)AcousticsAlgorithmElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsOmnidirectional antennaPhysicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A system to measure the direction of arrival (DOA) of a signal within a 45-degree conical sector is demonstrated. The system is compact and uses only four circularly polarized patch elements. A printed beamforming network is used to create a set of partially overlapping beams allowing DOA estimation without ambiguity. Neural networks are used to first classify the antenna signals and then estimate the DOA. The proposed system was validated experimentally in C band and, in spite of the highly disturbed beams caused by the finite size of the antenna platform, it was shown that DOA estimation errors in the order of one degree were achievable under signal-to-noise ratios of 10 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207