MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004526006 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0214

Probability Distribution and Spatial Dependence of Nitrous Oxide Emission

2006· article· en· W2004526006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsVariogramSpatial distributionProbability distributionEnvironmental scienceMathematicsFlux (metallurgy)Atmospheric sciencesStatisticsSoil scienceKrigingGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate controls soil N 2 O emissions via its effects on soil properties such as water‐filled pore space. Changes in climate should produce changes in the probability distribution and spatial dependency of soil N 2 O data. Knowing the extent of the changes in the distribution of this data is important for validating model predictions. The objectives of this study were to describe the probability distributions and estimate the spatial dependency of soil N 2 O emission data. On a hummocky, agricultural landscape in Saskatchewan, N 2 O emission data and related soil variables were taken from a 128‐point transect 15 times over 2 yr. Probability distributions were compared using a Chi‐square test. The range in spatial correlation was determined using the indicator semivariogram with a nested model fit approach. The mean N 2 O flux ranged from 25.3 to −0.2 ng N 2 O–N m −2 s −1 Probability distributions ranged in shape from reverse J‐shape through log normal to symmetrical. The majority of distributions were statistically different from each other, showing a lack of temporal stability. Mean N 2 O flux and distribution shape followed an event‐based/background emission pattern. High flux events had statistically similar, reverse J‐shaped distributions. As mean N 2 O flux decreased to a background level distribution, shape changed to log normal and symmetrical forms. A high nugget/sill ratio characterized the majority of sampling dates, although spatial dependency was generally moderate. Flux values in the fourth quartile tended to have a spatial dependency of 15 m, probably reflecting a topographic control at a landform element scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it