Application of a risk indicator for assessing trends in dryland salinization risk on the Canadian Prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moderate to severe soil salinity currently affects the surface 60 cm of approximately 1 million ha within agricultural regions of the prairies. The subsoil (60–120 cm) is affected on about 3.5 million ha. The risk of soil salinization (RSS) indicator was developed to measure and monitor the change in risk of soil salinization in the Canadian Prairies as a function of changes in agricultural land use and management practices as reported in the Canadian Census of Agriculture. We have expressed the RSS indicator in five classes from very low to very high risk. In 1981, 18.4% of the land area in the agricultural regions of the prairies was rated as having a moderate or higher risk of salinization. By 2001 this had improved to less than 12% (8 million ha). Prairie-wide the land area at high and very high risk of salinization decreased from 6.2 to 4.4% of agricultural landscapes and the area at moderate risk decreased from 12.2 to 7.3%. We attribute this improvement largely to a reduction in summer fallow with a minor contribution from increased use of permanent cover. Although the risk of soil salinization is far from eliminated, the trend is towards greater agri-environmental sustainability. Key words: Risk of soil salinization, dryland salinity, land use, summer fallow, permanent cover
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".