Ultrastructure of the fertilized embryo sac in the dwarf mistletoe <i>Arceuthobium americanum</i> (Viscaceae) and development of the caecum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-fertilization changes in the seven-celled embryo sac of the parasitic angiosperm Arceuthobium americanum Nutt. ex Engelm. were investigated with light, fluorescence, and electron microscopy. Two embryo sacs, of which only one is fertilized, are found within the reduced ategmic ovule (the placentalnucellar complex). All cells of the fertilized embryo sac developed thickened cellulosic and (or) hemicellulosic bounding walls and, aside from the degenerative synergid, acquired ultrastructure reflective of metabolically active cells. The filiform apparatus became thickened in the persistent synergid, and a similar structure developed in the antipodals. Unlike the changes observed in the zygote and central cell, those in the persistent synergid and antipodals were unusual, as these cells regularly degenerate after fertilization in a typical angiosperm; therefore, in A. americanum, they likely play a role in providing nutrition to the zygote and (or) central cell. A pouch-like outgrowth (caecum) initiated from the central cell near the primary endosperm nucleus and, after vacuolar expansion and intercellular growth, reached the base of the placentalnucellar complex in three days. The observation of mitochondria clusters within the central cell, caecum, and adjacent placentalnucellar complex cells suggests the caecum functions in embryo sac expansion and haustorial nutrient absorption.Key words: Arceuthobium, caecum, cell walls, fertilized embryo sac, mistletoe, ultrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".