MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004592836 · doi:10.4039/n03-096

Distributions of leafmining sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) on birch and alder in northwestern Canada

2004· article· en· W2004592836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTenthredinidaeAlderBetulaceaeHymenopteraAlnus glutinosaHayEcologyBiologyBotanyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exotic leafmining sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) on birch ( Betula spp., Betulaceae) have become widely distributed in Canada since their introduction to eastern North America in the last century (Digweed et al. 1997). However, their distributions north of the 60th parallel are poorly known (Digweed et al. 2003). No birch leafmining sawflies were detected at Hay River and Louise Falls, Northwest Territories (NT), in 1993, but the ambermarked birch leafminer, Profenusa thomsoni (Konow), was reported from Yellowknife, NT, in 1994 (Digweed et al. 1997). Since that time, P. thomsoni populations have reached epidemic levels on urban birches in Yellowknife and Hay River, NT (unpublished data). While examining infested birches in Hay River in 2003, the authors also found the European alder leafminer, Fenusa dohrnii (Tischbein), attacking alder ( Alnus spp., Betulaceae).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it