A Partial Magnesium Hydroxide Substitution for Sodium Hydroxide in Peroxide Bleaching of an Aspen CTMP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partial substitution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) by magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) as the alkali source was studied in peroxide bleaching of an aspen chemi-thermomechanical pulp (CTMP). The effects on pulp properties, including pulp strength, optical property and carboxylic groups content, and process characteristics, such as oxalate and anionic trash formation, were studied. The X–ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) technique was used to determine the lignin and extractives concentrations on the fiber surface. With the increased Mg(OH)2 substitution ratio, the peroxide bleaching process gave a higher pulp yield and peroxide bleaching efficiency, produced pulps with higher light scattering coefficient and bulk, while the total oxalate, anionic trash, and chemical oxygen demand load (COD) were less. The total carboxylic groups content and the surface charge of pulp fibers were decreased. The underlying mechanism responsible for the decreased strength properties, when the Mg(OH)2 substitution ratio was increased, is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".