Plasticity in the maternal circuit: Effects of experience and partum condition on brain astroctye number in female rats.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Female rats that have received a maternal experience undergo enhanced c-fos expression in a number of brain sites when reexposed to pups. The present 2 studies examined changes in the expression of another brain protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which is a major unit of the astrocytic cytoskeleton. In both experiments, primiparous and multiparous female rats were given varying amounts of postpartum contact with pups and overdosed after varying intervals, with no pups. Brains were prepared for GFAP immunohistochemical analysis. In both studies, Day 5 postpartum multiparous subjects given additional postpartum contact with pups, when compared with pup-exposed primiparous subjects, were found to have significantly higher numbers of GFAP positive cells in the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus, an area critical for the expression of maternal behavior, but not in control sites. In Experiment 2, an opposite effect of parity was found in the medial amygdala and habenula.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".