The evaluation of a social work program in a hospital-based family practice unit in Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English This article explores clients' perceptions of a family practice-based social work program as a step towards better understanding the feasibility of social work as an integral part of primary care. Results revealed that the program was effective in helping clients to deal with their situation, and overall a high level of satisfaction with the service was reported. These results highlight the potential bene.ts of family practice-based social work programs. French Cette é tude explore les perceptions des clients quant à un programme de travail social en pratique familiale. Il s'agit d'un pas en avant dans une compré hension de la faisabilité d'inté grer, à part entiè re, le travail social au aux soins primaires. Les ré sultats ré vè lent l'efficacité de l'aide apporté e aux clients pour faire face à leur situation dans le cadre d'un tel programme inté gré . Un haut niveau de satisfaction des services offerts a é té rapporté . Ces ré sultats mettent en valeur les bé né fices potentiels d'un programme de travail social axé sur une pratique familiale. Spanish Se exploraron las percepciones de los clientes de un programa de trabajo social basado en una clínica de medicina familiar, con el objetivo de entender mejor la viabilidad del trabajo social como parte integral del cuidado primario. Los resultados revelaron que el programa era efectivo en ayudar a los clientes a bregar con su situación. Revelaron tambié n un alto nivel de satisfacción con los servicios. Los resultados iluminan los beneficios potenciales de programas de trabajo social basados en clínicas de medicina familiar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".