MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toward an understanding of transfusion‐related acute lung injury: statement of a consensus panel

2004· review· en· W2004668542 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Kleinman, Tim Caulfield, Penny Chan, Robertson D. Davenport, Janice G. McFarland, Susan McPhedran, Maureen O. Meade, Douglas Morrison, Thomas Pinsent, Pierre Robillard, Peter Slinger

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsDynamic Systems Analysis (Canada)Royal Columbian Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfusion-related acute lung injuryConsensus conferenceMedicineStatement (logic)Intensive care medicineBlood transfusionMEDLINELungInternal medicinePolitical sciencePulmonary edema

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peer Reviewed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.070
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.096
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0700.096
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0140.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations723
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207