MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004678190 · doi:10.1109/eic.2014.6869385

High Voltage Test Facility commissioning and utilization

2014· article· en· W2004678190 on OpenAlexaffabout
W. McDermid, John S. Lambert, Nathan D. Jacob, N. Polischuk, Atul Manmohan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsManitoba Hydro
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringEngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringContainment (computer programming)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manitoba Hydro's High Voltage Test Facility was justified as a means of reducing avoidable costs and improving the safety of 245 kV and 500 kV equipment. The test hall has dimensions of 41 m × 38 m with 21 m from the floor to the hook of the bridge crane. The test hall is equipped with oil spill containment, three types of fire detection sensors, and a compressed air foam system for fire suppression. The major test systems of the facility were installed during the period of November 2011 through January 2013. Initial utilization experience is reported. Existing accelerated aging facilities for generator stator coils and bars have been maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207