Interleukin 28B Gene Polymorphisms in Hepatitis C Virus-related Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the interleukin 28B (IL-28B) gene region are strongly predictive of the response of infected patients to antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV). We sought to determine the prevalence of SNP IL-28B rs12979860 C/C and non-C/C (C/T plus T/T) genotypes in HCV-related cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV), as compared with HCV-positive patients without CV. We also searched for their association with peculiar clinical manifestations of CV and potential influence on the complete response (virological, molecular, and immunological) to the therapy. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 159 and 172 HCV-infected patients with and without CV, respectively, prospectively followed starting from 1990. SNP rs12979860 genotyping was performed by Taq-Man allelic discrimination. In 106 patients (66.6%) with CV, the profile of circulating B cell clonalities was determined as well. All patients with CV were treated with pegylated interferon-α/ribavirin-based antiviral therapy. RESULTS: The T/T IL-28B genotype was more common in patients with CV than in those without (17% vs 8.1%, p = 0.02). In patients with CV, compared with non-C/C variants, the IL-28B C/C genotype was associated with a higher rate of complete response (52.6% vs 39.2%, p = 0.13), whereas a treatment response of 61.4% was demonstrated when solely virological response was considered (p = 0.008). A higher frequency of expanded B cell clonalities in the circulation (84.2% vs 55.9%; p = 0.005), kidney involvement (21% vs 2.9%; p = 0.003), and B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (17.5% vs 6.8%; p = 0.048), were also observed. CONCLUSION: In HCV-positive patients with CV, the IL-28B C/C genotype is distinguished biologically by a higher frequency of restriction of B cell response and clinically by a higher risk of cryoglobulinemic nephropathy and B cell malignancies, while acting as an independent predictor of a sustained virological response to antiviral therapy. In addition, we found that IL-28B T/T variant was more prevalent in patients with CV than in those without.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".