MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004817487 · doi:10.1029/2002ja009371

Bursty bulk flow intrusion to the inner plasma sheet as inferred from auroral observations

2003· article· en· W2004817487 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsti Kauristie, В. А. Сергеев, O. Amm, M. V. Kubyshkina, J. Jussila, E. Donovan, K. Liou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsSubstormPhysicsElectrojetGeophysicsPlasma sheetMagnetospherePlasmaMagnetic fieldLuminosityGeologyAstrophysicsEarth's magnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physics of the interaction of bursty bulk flows (BBFs) with the near‐Earth plasma is not yet known in detail. We address this issue with comprehensive observations made with the MIRACLE network during a well‐documented streamer event. In this case an equatorward intruding auroral streamer inclined from northwest (NW) to southeast (SE) reached the region of the proton oval of 486 nm (H β ) luminosity. This H β band is assumed to map poleward of the ≥30 keV proton isotropic boundary, which is at geocentric distances ∼7–8 R E according to the appropriate magnetic field models. A significant enhancement (30%) in the H β luminosity was recorded just at the time and in the location where the equatorward end of the streamer reached the H β band. This enhancement implies a corresponding pressure enhancement in the equatorial magnetosphere. The simultaneous poleward shift of the H β emission suggests that also a magnetic field dipolarization took place in the same region. An NW‐aligned electrojet (300–400 km in width) accompanied the equatorward development of the streamer (with streamer locating at the dusk flank of this electrojet), and it produced a sharp negative magnetic bay (∼300 nT) resembling a substorm onset. Both auroral and equivalent current observations suggest that the plasma jet was not completely dissolved or stopped during this interaction, but rather diverted in the azimuthal direction. Equivalent currents reconstructed from ground magnetic field observations indicate that a R1‐type field‐aligned current system (upward current ∼0.5 MA ) accompanied the streamer development. However, our observations do not show any signatures of a R2‐type current system expected to build up during the flow braking and diversion according to previously published simulation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207