Syntheses and structures of Li, Fe, and Mo derivatives of N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-o-phenylenediamine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Double deprotonation of N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-o-phenylenediamine (H2L) with n-BuLi in THF yields the dilithium complex Li2L(thf)3. The reaction of Li2L(thf)3 with FeBr2(thf)2 and subsequent replacement of the solvent with toluene yield LFe(η(6)-toluene), which can also be synthesized from Fe(HMDS)2(thf) and H2L in toluene. The NMR data, bond lengths obtained from an X-ray diffraction study, and DFT calculations indicate that the diamide ligand L(2-) undergoes oxidization to a radical ligand L(1-). Reaction of LFe(η(6)-toluene) with 1 atm CO yields the tricarbonyl complex LFe(CO)3. MoCl4(thf)2 reacts with two equivalents of Li2L(thf)3 to yield (LiL)2MoCl2(thf)4 in which the phenylene backbone of the ligand has been dearomatized. One-electron oxidation of Li2L(thf)3 by EuCl3(dme)2 yields the open-shell species LiL(OEt2), which was characterized by X-ray crystallography and EPR spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".