Claude-Marie Bonnefont, commissaire du Directoire dans le département de la Vienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Claude-Marie Bonnefont, nommé en 1796, occupe les fonctions de commissaire du Directoire dans le département de la Vienne jusqu'au début du Consulat. Ce modéré, compétent et actif, se révèle un bon administrateur. Toujours présent lors des réunions de l'administration départementale, il est en relation étroite avec les municipalités de canton, accélère la conscription, veille à la sécurité des routes et lutte contre les « brigands royaux ». Dans les rapports qu'il adresse aux ministres, il rend compte de l'opinion publique dont il fait une présentation optimiste alors qu'il y a des signes d'agitation. Après le coup d'État du 18 Fructidor an V, Bonnefont devient la cible préférée des anciens Jacobins. Il manque d'être destitué, mais réussit à se maintenir en place. Sous le Consulat et l'Empire, il sera secrétaire général de la préfecture de la Vienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".