De Washington a Londres: el G-20 enfrenta la crisis internacional 2008-2009
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las cumbres del G-20 de Washington y Londres, en palabras de los representantes de Estado ahi reunidos, suponian el nacimiento de nuevo sistema financiero. Posturas como la de Gordon Brown, declarando que un nuevo orden esta emergiendo… El Consenso de Washington se acabo, la de Barack Obama hay que acabar con la economia de burbujas y del presidente de Francia Nicolas Sarkozy celebrando la decadencia del modelo anglosajon de capitalismo ligeramente regulado, afirman lo anterior. Pero, ?realmente estamos ante nuevo orden financiero? Este articulo tiene como objetivo explicar por que dicho planteamiento es falso y como deben interpretarse los resultados de estas cumbres. A manera de recordatorio, el G-20 esta formado por Alemania, Arabia Saudita, Argentina, Australia, Brasil, Canada, China, Corea del Sur, Estados Unidos, Francia, India, Indonesia, Italia, Japon, Mexico, Reino Unido, Rusia, Sudafrica, Turquia y la Union Europea
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it